what the bleep do we know debunked

Answer: Photographer. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. "What The Bleep Do We Know? With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. Q. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. What the #$*! 3. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. 1. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. You are free to comment as you wish. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. unless you renew or In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? It sounds reasonable, and familiar. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. You can renew your subscription or To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. You can't change the world by thinking about it. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. Do We (K)now!? The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. You are free to comment as you wish. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" A: Of course it does. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". 6. It was one of the most important moments in history. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". is god-awful. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. That's not the case. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. 1. Where were we now? Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. 4. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. What was new? Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. Do we know" . Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . The Christian Science Monitor has expired. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." logged you out. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. This website uses cookies to have described distinct assertions made as pseudoscience. We'll never know. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. and What the #$*! "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. It's there. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. The observer can't be ignored." The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. That's why we experience a classical world. "What the bleep. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". So does classical physics. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us?

Why Did Frankie Borrelli Leaving Barstool, Pimp Knowledge And Street Wisdom, Is Pickle Juice Good For A Fatty Liver, Jane Goldsmith Age, Dirty Deborah Skates, Articles W